Tumblr’s current ownership has been a far better steward of the platform than anyone since it’s earliest days, but that Tumblr Live product was absolutely baffling. It’s not even the idea that was bad (even though there are no circumstances in which i would like it), it’s that the implementation was insanely un-Tumblr-like in any way you could imagine. And it never improved. So weird.
LA Times editor resigns after banning Muslim and Palestinian reporters (among others) who dared to criticize media coverage of Israeli attacks on Gaza.
“The United States remained in Afghanistan for ten years after anyone had any good explanation for why we were there. Obama wanted to leave. But he got rolled by the Pentagon. Biden knew that the only way to really leave was to leave. Someone had to bite the bullet. He bit that bullet and paid a big price and didn’t look back.”
Kelly and Zach Weinersmith’s “A City On Mars”
ALTIn A City On Mars, biologist Kelly Weinersmith and cartoonist Zach Weinersmith set out to investigate the governance challenges of the impending space settlements they were told were just over the horizon. Instead, they discovered that humans aren't going to be settling space for a very long time, and so they wrote a book about that instead:
The Weinersmiths make the (convincing) case that ever aspect of space settlement is vastly beyond our current or reasonably foreseeable technical capability. What's more, every argument in favor of pursuing space settlement is errant nonsense. And finally: all the energy we are putting into space settlement actually holds back real space science, which offers numerous benefits to our species and planet (and is just darned cool).
Every place we might settle in space – giant rotating rings, the Moon, Mars – is vastly more hostile than Earth. Not just more hostile than Earth as it stands today – the most degraded, climate-wracked, nuke-blasted Earth you can imagine is a paradise of habitability compared to anything else. Mars is covered in poison and the sky disappears under planet-sized storms that go on and on. The Moon is covered in black-lung-causing, razor-sharp, electrostatically charged dust. Everything is radioactive. There's virtually no water. There are temperature swings of hundreds of degrees every couple of hours or weeks. You're completely out of range of resupply, emergency help, or, you know, air.
There's Helium 3 on the Moon, but not much of it, and there is no universe in which is it cheaper to mine for Helium 3 on the Moon than it is to mine for it on Earth. That's generally true of anything we might bring back from space, up to and including continent-sized chunks of asteroid platinum.
Going to space doesn't end war. The countries that have gone to space are among the most militarily belligerent in human history. The people who've been to space have come back perfectly prepared to wage war.
Going to space won't save us from the climate emergency. The unimaginably vast trove of material and the energy and advanced technology needed to lift it off Earth and get it to Mars is orders of magnitude more material and energy than we would need to resolve the actual climate emergency here.
We aren't anywhere near being a "multiplanetary species." The number of humans you need in a colony to establish a new population is hard to estimate, but it's very large. Larger than we can foreseeably establish on the Moon, on Mars, or on a space-station. But even if we could establish such a colony, there's little evidence that it could sustain itself – not only are we a very, very long way off from such a population being able to satisfy its material needs off-planet, but we have little reason to believe that children could gestate, be born, and grow to adulthood off-planet.
To top it all off, there's space law – the inciting subject matter for this excellent book. There's a lot of space law, and while there are some areas of ambiguity, the claims of would-be space entrepreneurs about how their plans are permissible under the settled parts of space law don't hold up. But those claims are robust compared to claims that space law will simply sublimate into its constituent molecules when exposed to the reality of space travel, space settlement, and (most importantly) space extraction.
Space law doesn't exist in a vacuum (rimshot). It is parallel to – and shares history with – laws regarding Antarctica, the ocean's surface, and the ocean's floor. These laws relate to territories that are both vastly easier to access and far more densely populated by valuable natural resources. The fact that they remain operative in the face of economic imperatives demands that space settlement advocates offer a more convincing account than "money talks, bullshit walks, space law is toast the minute we land on a $14 quadrillion platinum asteroid."
“Don’t Mess With Texas!” is the slogan from an anti-littering campaign.
Trent Reznor, Mariqueen Reznor, Atticus Ross, and The Alumni Band cover David Bowie’s Fashion.
That’s some good shit.
Beep beep!
Anonymous asked:
If I recall correctly, weren’t you a pretty big fan of Bill Clinton for some time? I recall a lot of posts from you about him that were fairly favorable. When did you finally accept that he was a creep? Do you think there’s finally a chance of accountability?
I am truly asking from a place of empathy as I know what it’s like to have someone you looked up turn out to be not so great.
deadpresidents answered:
No, you’re 100% correct. I was a fan of Bill Clinton for a long time. He was President from the time I was 13 until I was 21, and for a kid who was into Presidential history and Democratic politics, he was a major presence in my life. I still think that he is probably the most naturally-gifted politician of my lifetime. Nobody that I’ve watched has been able to explain public policy or instantly breeze through complicated press conference questions like Bill Clinton. For years after he left office, I said that he should just be the guy who explains how things work to America; he’s remarkably smart.
One of the craziest examples of Clinton’s intelligence is that he had to figure out ways to make it look like he doesn’t have the answer to everything immediately. Clinton’s political advisers thought he came across at times like a know-it-all and that it wasn’t a good look on the campaign trail. You know how one of the famous mannerisms of Clinton is how he’ll pause while he’s speaking and bite his lip, like this?
Well, that was done on purpose. Clinton’s advisers thought that his quick, completely formed answers to complicated questions was unnatural and that he needed to make himself seem more thoughtful, so he’d pause and bite his lip almost as an intellectual speed bump. Paul Begala, one of the most important leaders of Clinton’s 1992 campaign explained:
“He was so smart about so many things but also could connect. The whole thing about his biting his lip – that was coached. Because he would answer so fast. We’d say, ‘Take a beat. Pretend you’re thinking about it. Pretend you haven’t already got an answer.’ It was a studied thing to give himself a second to force himself to slow down.”
So, things like that were why I was always so impressed and appreciative of Clinton’s skills and political gifts.
But, obviously, as I’ve gotten older and come to understand his personal actions a lot better, it’s really hard not to consider him a creep. I mean, the Epstein thing is obviously impossible to reconcile. Even if it there hasn’t been any suggestion of Clinton actually abusing any of the girls in the way that Epstein did, he spent a lot of time around Epstein and it’s gross. I think one of Epstein’s victims said that Clinton was a “total gentleman” and didn’t do anything wrong to her, but that photo of a very young girl giving him a neck message in what looks like an airport terminal is a really bad look. That was clearly after he left office, so that was post-Monica Lewinsky and there’s no way that Clinton should have even put himself near that type of situation with a girl that young – even if it was just a neck massage that lasted a short amount of time. Even if the girl offered to do it willingly and had no issues with it, that’s not a situation that Clinton – who was impeached and could have been removed from office because he had an affair with a young woman – should have have felt comfortable with.
But beyond that, as I’ve gotten older and as we’ve all gotten better about recognizing these things, his relationship with Monica Lewinsky is what bothers me because of the position that he put Monica in. She was in her early 20s – barely older than Clinton’s daughter – and he was President of the United States. Listen, I don’t have any room to criticize someone for dating younger women (seriously), but it’s the power dynamic and the manner in which he treated Monica when things started to get difficult for him. That poor girl was in such an unimaginable place because of what Clinton did and how he – the incumbent President of the United States – spoke about her publicly and treated her privately. When you think about it in terms of a relationship, it’s just a crazy situation. And the poise that Monica Lewinsky had then and now speaks volumes about the person she is and has become, so it just makes Clinton look that much more terrible in comparison.
It is disappointing because I was a fan of President Clinton for most of my life. And, like Richard Nixon, he was so gifted when it came to his intellectual powers and, in Clinton’s case, his political skills, that his flaws and his actions were overlooked for too long. I don’t know what kind of accountability there might be for Clinton now that he’s been out of office for nearly 25 years and is a few years away from his 80th birthday. But I can say that I feel like I know who he is now and “creep” seems like a pretty fitting description.
“They go into these general elections, they’ll have 900 same day registrations, which are the kids coming out of the schools and basically doing what I did when I was a kid, which is [vote liberal]. They don’t have life experience and they don’t have life experience and they just vote their feelings and they’re taking away the town’s ability to govern themselves, it’s not fair.”
—
Bill O'Brien, Republican House Speaker in New Hampshire
The heavily Republican house is pushing two bills that would limit the voting rights of students. This sort of thing is happening across the country. Republicans are seeking to restrict the rights of anyone who might vote Democrat.
This is from 2011. It’s not Trumpism. It’s just what Republicans do. They suppress the vote of anyone who might not vote for them. It’s the only way they can win.
“Frankly, my toilets don’t work in my house, and I blame you.”
— Rand Paul, to Energy Department deputy assitant secretary Kathleen Hogan
Think of the stupidest thing you can say, say it, then watch the Republican votes roll in.